| |













|
|
TITLE: Assessment of vacuum cleaners and vacuum cleaner bags recommended for allergic subjects.
AUTHORS: Vaughan JW; Woodfolk JA; Platts-Mills TA
AUTHOR AFFILIATION: University of Virginia Asthma and Allergic Diseases Center,
Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
SOURCE: J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999 Nov; 104(5): 1079-83
CITATION IDS: PMID: 10550756 UI: 20020198
ABSTRACT:
| |
BACKGROUND: High-quality vacuum cleaners and vacuum cleaner bags
are often recommended to allergic patients as a means of reducing indoor
allergen exposure. A number of vacuum cleaners on the market today claim to
capture 99.9% of particles 0.3 micron or larger entering the vacuum cleaner,
and many vacuum cleaner bags are now being sold as microfiltration bags.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the allergen-trapping
abilities of vacuum cleaners and to use a new technique for testing vacuum
cleaner bags that are recommended for allergic patients.
METHODS: Vacuum cleaners were tested in an 18m3 laboratory
room permeated with dust containing high levels of cat allergen by using
techniques previously described. Air was sampled using parallel filters in
conjunction with a particle counter. The filters were assayed by ELISA for
cat allergen (Fel d 1). Vacuum cleaner bags were tested by using a modified
dust trap to pull sieved house dust containing a known amount of Fel d 1
across the material used for the bag. Allergen passing through the bag was
trapped on a filter covering the exit of the trap and analyzed for Fel d 1.
RESULTS: In general, vacuum cleaners designed for allergic patients
leaked lower amounts of allergen (<0.5-4.04 ng/m3) than that
found in our previous studies (<0.5-100 ng/m3). Single-layer
vacuum cleaner bags performed poorly (1250-2640 ng recovered) compared with
most of the 2- and 3-layer microfiltration bags (0.53-2450 ng recovered).
The range of allergen recovered from the 2-layer bags (0.93-2450 ng recovered)
highlighted the variability found between manufacturers.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that although allergen leakage has
been reduced, there is still room for improvement. A method of testing
allergen leakage by using Fel d 1 should be applied to vacuum cleaners
and bags recommended for allergic patients. |
|
|